Lock and load Dissidents! We’ll be talking about guns and drugs today.
Today I start out talking about how almost every mass shooter in the United States is a known threat to law enforcement before the mass shooting.
Then I discuss and show examples from ssristories.org, which clearly shows how almost all mass shooters on SSRi’s and known mental patients.
After psych meds, I quote from a fascinating article from The Guardian showing that nearly all the gun violence in the United States happens in inner-cities. Something we all basically know, but politicians can not talk about without being called racist by the legacy news and their woke talking heads.
Then, I discuss the Second Amendment and gun rights. I go off subject a little comparing the media’s treatment of Darrell Brooks vs Kyle Rittenhouse and finally wrap it up talking about how, in my opinion, poor parenting is at the root of nearly all violent behavior.
0:20
All right. Good morning, everybody. Welcome back to the dissident dispatch.
To most sane people, it's obvious that in the United States, guns are not the problem. Those individuals who pull the trigger, the ones that loose their shit, that's the problem. I know, this goes without saying for the vast majority of people, and all of the law abiding citizens who own guns, criminals are always going to find a way to find a weapon. And usually it's going to be a gun, because that's the most effective and the most easiest to find. If they can't find a gun, then they're going to resort to something else to engage in their criminal act. Google machete attack and look at how many hits come up just in the United States alone. It's quite eye opening. Look at the guy Darrell Brooks, and what he did in Waukesha, Wisconsin. Just before Christmas, I believe it was last Christmas.
People who are always screaming about gun control use mass shootings and school shootings as their excuse to try and rein in the Second Amendment. Two sentences always come out well after the fact, after the first wave of headlines about the shooting. There are two sentences that always come out later. Those sentences are "previously known to law enforcement" or the FBI or local police or whatever, and "treated for 'fill in the blank' mental disorder", which almost always means that the shooter was on some sort of psychiatric meds, usually an SSRI.
In nearly every mass casualty event, the shooters are known by law enforcement, they have a history for some sort of extreme violent behavior. It almost always comes out after the fact. How hard is it for law enforcement to keep an eye on these lunatics? If you're getting reports that these people are crazy, and violent, how hard is it to put someone to monitor these guys?
Oh, yeah, that's right. law enforcement in the United States, at least it seems at the FBI, they're too busy hassling grandmas who are outside the capitol on January 6, waving an American flag. They're (too busy) doing reconnaissance on parents who dare to speak up at school board meetings about things like critical race theory, or pornographic books in the elementary school library. They're too busy watching those people or chasing those people down. Or sometimes local law enforcement is too busy helping to medically kidnap some kid whose parents took them in for a checkup because they're sick, (Dr's) found out they weren't vaccinated or something, so the CPS shows up, wonts take their kids away. So you have to post some police at the door there to keep the parents from taking control of their own child. You got to do that. But you can't watch the lunatics who are probably gonna do a mass shooting and have shown a history of violent behavior.
Here's just a few examples of mass shooters recently that were known by law enforcement. Let me give examples here.
Robert Crimo III, the Highland Park shooter on July 4th. He is the one that shot the people in the parade, and he was dressed up as a woman to try to hide his identity. He was posting videos foretelling his alleged violent acts. Alleged, I guess he's not found guilty yet. He called himself "Awake the Rapper" on YouTube. If you watch some of these videos, they are probably scrubbed by now, but I watched a little bit of a few of them and, it's just totally ridiculous. In one of the videos he dramatizes a school shooting. In another one, he animates his own demise in a confrontation with police. In 2019 relatives of Crimo's called the police because he had a collection of knives and he said, "he was going to kill everyone." I think that probably validates the need to have somebody really watching this kid very, very closely. Granted, you (law enforcement) may not have been able to stop the shooting, but this kid obviously had mental health issues. And someone needed to be keeping a very, very close eye on this guy.
What about Peyton Gendron? The 18 year old Buffalo, New York shooter who shot all the people up at a grocery store. As a senior in high school, he supposedly wrote a paper saying he wanted to commit murder suicide. The principal contacted the New York State Police, and only after a day and a half mental evaluation he was released and wasn't even flagged to the authorities.
Connor Betts from Dayton, Ohio, way back at the Ned Peppers Bar Shooting in 2019. He killed nine, including his brother, and he wounded 17 other people before officers were able to kill him. According to the US Secret Service, of all people(or authorities). "He had a history of concerning communications including harassing female students in middle and high school, making a hit list and a rape list in high school, telling others he had attempted suicide and showing footage of a mass shooting to his girlfriend." Geez, how many red flags do you need for somebody to act to do something about that guy?
5:10
Remember the guy Nicholas Cruz, who was the shooter at the Marjory Stoneman Douglas High School in Parkland, Florida? That was back in 2018. The one that infuriated David Hogg and now he's going around trying to get everybody's guns taken away. That kid(Cruz) opened fire inside his school, killed 17 and wounded 17 more. Local police just basically stood down, that's a whole other topic. According to an FBI statement in 2018, a month before the shooting, the FBI was warned about Cruz through a tip line. The FBI said, "the caller provided information about Cruz's gun ownership, desire to kill people, erratic behavior, and disturbing social media posts as well as the potential of him conducting a school shooting." Holy shit! Some tipster lays it all out for the FBI. What did the FBI do? Did they go check on this guy? How hard would it be for them to just post somebody up? Just part time maybe, while schools in session, have somebody keep an eye on that guy. The FBI admitted that he was a threat to life and it should have been investigated. You fucking think? Again, who missed that call? You guys (FBI) too busy harassing conservatives, going down to Mar a Lago and spying on Trump? Spying on grandma's or pissed off parents who are talking back to school boards? Protecting Hunter Biden, maybe hiding his laptop?What the fuck are you doing FBI? (I know most FBI agents are good people, just doing their job. The politically motivated, partisan leadership is the problem.)
Let me read from you an article by ABC News titled "Missing Signals in Four Mass Shootings, What Went Wrong?” "Alerting someone or given a warning sign before a mass shooting is common. According to the US Secret Service, which published a report in 2020 titled 'Mass Attacks in Public Spaces.' The report found that nearly 65% of the mass attacks they studied in 2019, the attacker had threatened someone in the past. And 57% of attackers made some form of communication prior to the attack that should have elicited concern but didn't. These concerning communications included making paranoid statements, sharing videos of previous mass attacks, vague statements about their imminent death and one attacker telling his school counselor that he had a dream about killing his classmates, the report says. Hello, hello, Houston. We have a problem.
7:37
Why don't we take some of the resources from the FBI? Hell, let's take some of these 87,000 IRS agents that they're about to hire, move those over to some kind of Lunatic Watch Program. Post those guys (agents) up. Every time one of these calls comes in or a counselor reports some kid that's saying he wants to go kill a bunch of people or kill his classmates or God knows whatever? Fucking assign an agent to those guys, do something! Keep an eye on them.
But that's probably not going to happen. Because hell, I don't know, maybe the FBI likes to let these guys hang out there until they do something, and then they(FBI) can scream at the next budget appropriations committee saying, "oh, we need more, we need more money! Look, look at all these mass shootings." How about we try and keep an eye on these people before it happens?
(I understand most FBI agents are good people just doing their job, but the leadership is politically motivated and partisan, weaponizing the program against political enemies.)
I want to talk a little bit about how almost all these mass shooters are on some sort of psych meds, usually SSRI’s, which stands for Selective Serotonin Reuptake Inhibitors. These are drugs like Prozac, Luvox, Zoloft, Paxil, and a whole host of others that are pushed by big pharma. Doctors are known for mixing these drugs without really being sure what the consequences are. You've heard about the drug cocktails, well, maybe these chemical cocktails are dangerous, kind of like vaccines on the children's vaccine schedule. Let's just mix and match a whole bunch(drugs or vaccines) together and as long as nothing happens within the first few days, it's fine, just keep on rolling.
You want to have an awakening to how serious the effects of these SSRI drugs are? You want to educate yourself? You should go to ssristories.org and read through all of the stories there about all the violent behavior, murder and mayhem that people taking SSRIs have caused, it's crazy. There are 1000s of stories, literally, of murders, suicides, violent behavior. It's incredible. It's from people taking these medications, or had been taken them and then recently quit. It's an eye opener, believe me.
9:44
Let me go through just a few examples. I'm going to start with the mother of all school shootings, Columbine. The one that got it all going. I'm going to be reading directly from the site(ssristories.org) here.
"Eric Harris of Columbine fame was on Zoloft, then Luvox, his partner in crime Dylan Klebold, his medical records have been sealed and never available to the public." I wonder why? "But at least one public report exists of a friend of Klebold, who allegedly witnessed him taking the antidepressants Paxil and Zoloft. Okay, if you don't remember Harris and Klebold they killed 12 students, and one teacher and wounded 23 others before killing themselves. And that whole Columbine story, if you dig deep into that, there's some really weird shit going on. The history of these guys, their parents, the reaction of the police and everything that happened there, it's pretty scary. But that's for another day.
Let's go on to another one. "Jeff Weis, sixteen years old. He was on Prozac when he shot his grandfather, his grandfather's girlfriend and many of his fellow students at Red Lake Minnesota. He then shot himself, 10 Dead 12 wounded."
Corey Baudsgard, sixteen, Whaluka, Washington State. High School. He was on Paxil. "He took a rifle to his high school and held 23 classmates hostage. He has no memory of that event."
Kip Kinkel, fifteen, Prozac and Ritalin. "Shot his parents while they slept, then went to school and opened fire killing two classmates and injuring 22. This was shortly after he had began Prozac treatment."
Luke Woodham, sixteen, Prozac. "Killed his mother and then killed two students wounded six others."
Michael Carneal Ritalin, fourteen. "Opened fire on students at a high school prayer meeting in West Paducah, Kentucky. Three teenagers were killed five others were wounded."
Andrew Golden, eleven, Ritalin and Michael Johnson age fourteen, also Ritalin. "Shot 15 people killing four students one teacher and wounded 10 others."
TJ Solomon, fifteen, Ritalin high school student, Conyers, Georgia. "Opened fire wounded six of his classmates."
James Wilson, age nineteen, various psychiatric drugs from South Carolina. "Took a 22 caliber revolver into an elementary school, killing two young girls and wounding seven other children and two teachers."
Steven Kazmierski. Prozac, Xanax and Ambien, Northern Illinois University. "Killing six people and wounding 21. He had three pistols and a shotgun."
Robert Stewart, Lexapro. "Walked into his estranged wife's work at Pine Lake Health and Rehab and opened fire. Killed eight elderly patients and wounded three others. He doesn't remember the incident."
James Holmes, the Batman movie killer, Sertraline. "When he walked into the showing of the Dark Knight with 240 caliber pistols an AR style 223 and a 12 gauge shotgun, he killed 12 and injured seven. In his personal notebook, which he sent to a psychiatrist the same day as the shooting shows that as the medication decreased his anxiety he lost his fear of consequences. As the dosage became higher, his thoughts became more obsessive and
Aaron Alexei, Washington Navy Yard shooting, Trazodone, a Serotonin Antagonist and Reuptake Inhibitor. SARI is what that's called, "Works much like an SSRI. He killed 12 people and injured eight others."
Ivan Lopez, Fort Hood, Texas. "Thirty-four year old U.S. soldier who shot 15 of his comrades, killing three of them. He was also taken antidepressants during the time of the shooting and his subsequent suicide."
Dylann Roof, the racist Charleston Church shooting guy. "Two years after Dylann Roof shot and killed nine people and injured another the court released documents that showed it was more mental health than hatred that led to the murders. The documents confirmed he was taking antidepressants."
Arcan Cetin, Cascade Mall, twenty years old. "Walked into the mall and shot and killed four women and one man. Records show that he was under care of a psychiatrist and taking medication for depression and ADHD including Prozac."
Nicholas Cruz, we mentioned before. "He reported that he takes medication regularly and keeps his appointments. The report states that Cruz suffers from depression, ADHD and autism."
This is just a portion of some of the famous ones I've pulled off from there(ssristories.org). But there are literally thousands more examples. I know that the naysayers they're gonna say, "but these people were crazy. They needed these drugs or they would have been worse." Would they?
14:37
I live in a foreign country, Central America to be exact. And there are people from all over the world here, friends of mine, and acquaintances. Occasionally, I have conversations about this type of stuff with them. When I mention how many friends and family members that I have personally in the States, and the amount of antidepressants and psychotropic type drugs (they take). Especially that I know kids and have family members whose kids are taking Ritalin and things like that for ADHD, they think it is completely, COMPLETELY INSANE. They're blown away! They can't even believe it.
The United States takes way more drugs than anybody else. Believe me. "According to Scientific American, in 2013, one in six Americans were taking a psychiatric drug. Antidepressants were the most common, followed by anxiety relievers and antipsychotics." That's almost ten years ago. What is it now? One in five, one in four?
According to an article written in 2021, in "Psychology Today" by John Read, PhD, a Professor of Clinical Psychology at the University of East London, the article titled, "Are Children and Adolescents over Prescribed Psychiatric Medications? The Psychiatric Drugging of our Children a Developing International Crisis." I'd say they're over prescribed, but let's let's hear what Dr. Read said or wrote.
"In the U.S.A. one in twelve children are on psychiatric drugs, including 1.2% of preschoolers and 12.9% of 12 to 17 year olds, the use of psychiatric drugs in children has been steadily increasing for many years in several countries, including the US and Australia. Little is known about the adverse effects of these powerful chemical agents alone or in combination on the developing brain." Yell, you know Big Pharma is not worried about long term studies on any of this stuff, not these cash cows. They just pump them(profit generating medications) out. Don't worry about what happens to society.
That is very important. We're giving our kids powerful mind altering medications while their brains are still developing. Think about that. Their brains aren't even developed yet and we are giving them mind altering medications. Would you give your kid acid or mushrooms or ecstasy? No! There's laws against kids even getting marijuana. The reason is, their brains aren't developed. But let's go ahead and give them these these drugs because these are approved by the FDA.
Some states have much higher percentages of children using psychiatric drugs compared to others. "14% of kids in West Virginia and 16.1% of kids in Louisiana are on some type of psychiatric drugs."
"The fastest growth for antidepressants over the past six years is among five to 11 year olds, with a 10.1% annual growth. For ADHD drugs and antipsychotics. The fastest annual growth is among preschoolers. Now the annual growth for preschoolers for ADHD and anti-psychotics is 12.7% and 7.9% respectively."
17:54
Preschoolers on anti-psychotics!? For the sake of humanity, this should not even be in the conversation! Why and how could a preschoolers environment be so horrible? So fucked up that he needs or she needs to be on antipsychotic medication? THAT'S INSANE!
"The consumption of psychiatric drugs by children and adults is far higher in the US than elsewhere. Partly because of direct to consumer advertising by drug companies, which is illegal almost everywhere else." (I wish I had dove deeper into this topic, maybe for another Dispatch.)
I would like to quote from Dr. Joseph Tarantolo a psychiatrist in Washington, DC, who, at one time was the president of the Washington Chapter of the American Society of Psychoanalytic Physicians. Dr. Tarantol stated, "All the SSRIs including Prozac and Luvox relieve the patient of feeling, he becomes less empathetic, as in I don't care as much, which means it's easier for me to to harm you. If a doctor treats someone who needs a great deal of strength just to think straight and gives him one of these drugs, that could push him over the edge into violent behavior." That makes sense to me, Dr. Tarantolo, it's a shame it doesn't to the majority of doctors in the United States.
In a column by Ariana Huffington from 1998, Dr. Peter R Breggen states, "I have no doubt that Prozac can cause or contribute to violence and suicide. I've seen many cases. In a recent clinical trial 6% of the children became psychotic on Prozac and manic psychosis can lead to violence.", Wow, 6% became psychotic. That's absurd. Six out of 100 kids taking these drugs are becoming psychotic, that should be raising serious alarm bells in the medical community.
19:49
Our kids are consuming more and more psychiatric medications and almost every mass casualty event in the U.S., the shooter is very often on one or more of these drugs. So it's a young person and he's medicated on psychiatric drugs.
Alright, let's jump back over to guns for a little bit. Everyone with a little bit of common sense knows that most gun violence is going on in inner city communities. I found a fascinating article by "The Guardian", and it's titled "Want to Fix Gun Violence in America? Go Local." It clearly shows, statistically mapped out, that almost all gun violence in the U.S. is concentrated within small geographic areas of major cities. Let me just point out a few things from the article. Just to make the point here. It's really cool, they have interactive heat maps, where you can see exactly where the majority of people are getting killed or maimed by guns. Of course, it's all in larger cities.
What it says, and this is based on statistics from 2015, there were more than 13,000 gun homicides across nearly 3500 cities and towns within the United States. It says, "half of America's gun homicides in 2015 were clustered in just 127 cities and towns, even though those cities and towns contain less than a quarter of the nation's population." We have half of the violence going on in just 127 cities and towns. How many cities and towns are there in the United States, hundreds of 1000's? So a quarter the population equals over half the violence.
But, "even within those cities, violence is further concentrated into tiny neighborhood areas that saw two or more gun homicide incidents in a single year. Four and a half million Americans live in areas of these cities with the highest numbers of gun homicide, which are marked by intense poverty, low levels of education, and racial segregation. A total of about 1200 neighborhoods census tracts, which laid side by side would fit into an area just 42 miles wide by 42 miles long." So think about it. As big as the United States is, how many people there are, how many towns... what's the State's population 300 million people now? You can basically take where half of the violence, gun violence goes on, those entire areas, and put them in a little piece 42 miles by 42 miles. You can drive across it in like 45 minutes.
22:30
So, "these neighborhood areas only contain 1% of the country's population, but they saw 26% of America's total gun homicides." That's dramatic, and you don't hear that on the news in the U.S. Nobody's going to tell you, and we can all talk about why. I'm gonna give you my two cents. In the news, it seems like, the only people who are... let me back up. On the national news and the international news, the only time you really hear about a murder in the United States as if it was some deranged white person, usually. At least those are the ones (shooting stories) they (legacy lame-stream narrative pushing news) will go on and on about. And they'll try and say that they were racists or conservative killing black people (or whatever the polarizing perceived minority is at the moment). Let's just be honest, that's what they push in the legacy media these days. And where all of this violence is happening, that we just talked about, where there's intense poverty, low levels of education and racial segregation, unfortunately means these are neighborhoods with mainly African Americans. It's sad, but it's true.
This Guardian article continues with something really profound and very common sense oriented. "Understanding this dramatic clustering of America's gun violence is crucial for the effort to save more lives. We can't do much about crime prevention of homicide if we try to attack it as a broad global problem, throwing money at it in a sort of broad global way. Said David Weisburd, a leading researcher on the geographic distribution of crime at George Mason University" Continuing, "America's gun policy debate is usually driven by high profile mass shootings that seem to strike at random, and it focuses on sweeping federal gun control or mental health policies. But much of America's gun homicide problem happens in a relatively small number of predictable places, often driven by predictable groups of high risk people, and its burden is anything but random. The concentration of gun homicides in certain census tracts mirrors, what criminologist have discovered when they look at crime patterns within individual cities, roughly 1.5% of street segments in cities see about 25% of crime incidents, most of the gun problems, most of the violence is happening in the inner cities. The logical thing to do would be concentrate efforts in those areas, not all across the United States." Not taking hunting rifles and guns from people out in flyover country. That's all based on common sense.
But of course, that is not what we have in the United States, especially when it comes to politicians. Again, anyone who's traveled a little bit (knows) there's always a certain area in a big city, no matter where you are in the world, you stay out of those areas, and you pretty much will never have a problem in your entire life.
The answer is not sweeping gun control all over the United States, the answer is go local. And of course, in those areas, those inner cities where the the problem is, who runs those cities? I would bet 100% of times, who runs those cities? Democrats. Democrats in those cities, have run them down, just ran those inner cities down into the ground, made them complete, violent, fucking danger zones. Then they're gonna get their cronies up in Washington to tell Mom and Pop law abiding citizens that they shouldn't have a gun out on their farm. It's total nonsense bullshit.
25:59
That's why we have a second amendment in the Constitution, it's the second one, it's right up near the top. Because the Founding Fathers they understood, hundreds of years ago, when they included the Second Amendment, in the US Constitution, they knew that the right to bear arms was the key, the absolute key for an individual person to protect themselves from either someone meaning to do them or their family harm. In a last line of defense for a free individual, the great equalizer. Or also in the hands of the citizenry, it was the last line of defense against a totalitarian tyrannical out of control government, like the founding fathers were facing in their time back in the American Revolution.
Back then the only people who couldn't own a weapon were slaves. Today, it's basically about the same damn thing. If your government is telling you, you can't have a weapon, that you can't own a gun to protect yourself just in case, (hopefully, you'll never have to use the thing to protect yourself) that you're not allowed to have one, you're basically their slave. That's what it comes down to.
Plus, today in the United States with the history of gun freedom, there are millions and millions of guns within its borders. I don't live in the States right now, but I have family up there. I'm from the Deep South, and all my family members have guns. They're locked and loaded. It's because it's their right and it's gun culture there in the South. People like to have guns.
If I moved back to the states, or if I was up there(living) right now, you're damn straight that I would have some sort of a gun. Because every crazy, every lunatic in that country has got weapons. If you don't have a gun, and one of those assholes, some crazy bastard tries to do something to you, you're gonna be in deep shit. Look at the guy in Ohio recently. What was his name, Elijah Dickens? The kid who took out the guy who was shooting up the mall. He laid his ass out. Thank God, that guy had a gun. That happens all the time.
Recently, I saw a video of an 80 year old lady in a convenience store and some dude comes in with a semi automatic, some kind of rifle. She pulled out a shotgun and blasted his ass. In many countries across the world, that lady wouldn't be allowed to have that gun. But damn sure that criminal is gonna get it (a gun or weapon). And she would have been toast. But she was able to defend herself. That's the way it should be.
Imagine if the shit ever hits the fan in the United States for crying out loud and it goes like, Road Warrior. You better believe you better have a gun. Your out of your mind, if you don't!
28:32
We cannot ignore the high percentage of violent acts that are caused by people on psychiatric medications. There's just too many instances. There's no easy solution, obviously. There's no easy solution to mass shootings and there's no easy solution to gun violence, or the sea of psychiatric medications that are out there floating around. Doctors just love to give them out like candy.
There's no way to guarantee a completely safe society that's free from dangerous things happening and crazy people acting violently. There's always going to be an instance. But definitely taking people's guns away is never going to change that and it's going to put people in a dangerous position where they're more likely to lose their lives. Criminals are always going to find some sort of a weapon. If they can't get their hands on a gun, they're going to figure out some way to carry out a violent act.
Think about Darrell Brooks, the guy who drove his car through the Christmas parade in Waukesha, Wisconsin. That guy fit into both categories (I mentioned earlier). He was previously known to law enforcement, and he was being treated or had been treated for mental disorders throughout his life. That guy's a fine example of a broken legal system, and how the legacy corrupt ass media who wants to push a narrative didn't hardly even talk about what he did, because he was a black guy, of course, I'm sure. He ran over a bunch of white people for the most part. You look (compare with) at Kyle Rittenhouse, who defended himself with a weapon while he's under attack and it was wall to wall all over the nation. I live in a foreign country and I saw articles down here in Spanish, talking about how he was on trial for killing black people, this was like CNN (I may have been wrong here, may have been another large network) these were major, news articles down here. I would talk to people... they're like, "oh that guy, Kyle Rittenhouse. You know the racist he was killing black people." I'd say, "dude no, it was white people" it was insane.
Wall to wall coverage of Kyle, didn't hear shit about Brooks. That guy drove his car in a Christmas parade killing six people and wounded at least 40. He was known to law enforcement. He was diagnosed with bipolar disorder and depression. Admitted in a mental hospital when he was 12. Had a rap sheet a mile long; domestic abuse, rape, reckless endangerment, battery, registered sexual offender, use of a dangerous weapon, bail jumping, disorderly conduct. Not too long before he ran over the people in the Christmas parade, he had ran over his ex girlfriend and was released on $1,000 bail. How the hell was that guy even able to get behind (the steering wheel of) a car? Also, Brooks once was facing 10 years in prison, but due to COVID and a backlog of court cases, which didn't allow him to the "guarantee of a speedy trial" he was allowed out by paying $500, and the case was basically closed.
Why don't we enforce the laws that we have and put people like this guy away? So he doesn't run over people at a Christmas parade? It's fucking insane. I'm sorry. I'm getting fired up, totally getting off topic here.
31:24
Let me let me "circle back" around like what's her name (Biden's past press secretary) made famous. This all comes back to one thing that I've mentioned at the end of my last two dispatches, it's kind of been a theme for me lately.
This all comes back to the parents.
Parents that are too busy, they're too disconnected. They're too trusting of medical professionals and the Big Pharma establishment, people who have no issue pushing dangerous medications without knowing the short term or long term effects, or if they do they hide that as best they can. Parents that are just too spiritually lost and just unhappy themselves. Parents who aren't present in their kids lives, aren't paying attention to what they're doing. These parents are just not aware enough to help their children filter out the information they take in on a daily basis.
These kids are growing up with a demented worldview. Learned from the bombardment of violence and negativity in popular media and culture these days. It's in the music. It's on the television and video games. It's on social media. Their young minds as they grow up are so much more susceptible to the divisive rhetoric that's being pushed by the legacy media. "If it bleeds, it reads" let's (media) get it out there! The legacy media, that in my opinion, is just hell bent on subverting anything to do with a traditional family dynamic. I've talked about it in the last two dispatches.
Some parents don't deserve to have children in the first place, they’re just hateful, abusive, and generally shitty people, which is probably because their parents were shitty. So it's just this endless cycle.
The combination of immoral and violence promoting pop culture, meshed with all the gender and race divisive woke culture, minus concerned, aware and morally grounded adult influences, like a morally strong father, it's just leaving today's modern kids confused and aimless to a point where they have no moral compass to guide them through life. Obviously, not all kids, I'm talking about a small percentage here, I'm talking about the crazy ones who go out and do crazy shit. But it's getting worse. There's no doubt it's getting worse. These kids are just left with a confused mind with no guidance or direction. So they're growing up to be confused, misguided adults.
The root cause of their anger, depression, anxiety, it's rarely addressed. Give them psych meds and antidepressants, whatever you can to just prescribe away and mask over their problems. We as a society, we've really got to find ways to address the root causes of this depression and anxiety that these kids, then growing up to adults, what they're suffering from. We've got to find the strength, the time, the sympathy and the systems to help them. We've got to speak out about the over prescription of these meds and what it's doing. We've got to speak out about the violence in pop culture, the over sexualization, all of it. We don’t need to find the next magic mind altering big pharma medical concoction to temporarily deal with and mask their mental issues.
34:45
These psychological disorders, repressed and hidden at the moment, festering, they're just going to boil over until they manifest into an explosive violent act. Which is what we see, which is what this whole diatribe Im going on is about really. And no amount of gun control or magic pharma pills are going to stop it. We've got to address the causes, we've got to look at what's causing these things so we can cure them.
Alright folks, that's enough for me today. I appreciate everyone listening. Sorry if I sound like I'm ranting. It's kind of hard for me to get behind this microphone and not kind of get a little bit angry, a little bit fired up. Guess I'm venting here.
I appreciate anyone who's listened to this. If you have a moment, go and like and subscribe, leave a review at your favorite podcast app for us.
Follow us at the dissidentdispatch.com, you can subscribe over at our Substack feed.
If you can leave a donation that would be awesome. I know it goes against the podcast rules to ask for donations until you get a little bit of a following but I'm just gonna throw it out there in case somebody's feeling generous.
I hope everyone has a great day and (it's a) beautiful sunshiny day where you are. I hope you can get outside get some vitamin D, get some exercise. Make your mind and your body feel great. Or if it's nighttime, there's a beautiful shiny (starry) sky out there, and you go out there and look up at the sky and enjoy the wonders of the universe, and enjoy what God's created for us.
I look forward to talking to you again.
Take care.
Follow and Subscribe to the Dissident Dispatch:
Web - https://dissidentdispatch.com
Substack -
Telegram - https://t.me/dissidentdispatch
Twitter - https://twitter.com/RealDissidents
Instagram - https://www.instagram.com/dissidentdispatch/
Sources:
http://www.whale.to/drugs/school_shooting.html
http://www.whale.to/c/pharma_drugs6.html
https://www.psychreg.org/antidepressants-ssri-mass-shootings/
https://www.nationalreview.com/the-morning-jolt/yet-another-mass-shooter-known-to-law-enforcement/
https://www.businessinsider.com/countries-largest-antidepressant-drug-users-2016-2
https://abcnews.go.com/Politics/missed-signals-mass-shootings-wrong/story?id=84846610
https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/1-in-6-americans-takes-a-psychiatric-drug/
https://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/nejmsa065779
Transcribed by https://otter.ai